TITLE: EXTENDING FOCUSING FRAMEWORKS TO PROCESS COMPLEX SENTENCES AND CORRECT THE WRITTEN ENGLISH OF PROFICIENT SIGNERS OF AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE AUTHOR: Linda Z. Suri COMMENTS: Ph.D. dissertation. (c) 1993 Linda Z. Suri ABSTRACT: In order for a computer system to understand written text, it must be able to interpret pronouns. A local focusing framework can be used to suggest a referent for a pronoun, and an inferencing mechanism that uses semantic and world knowledge can then accept or reject the proposed referent. The local focus is the person, property, object or concept which a sentence is most centrally about within the discourse context in which the sentence occurs. A local focusing framework consists of a (set of) focus tracking algorithm(s), and a (set of) algorithm(s) for suggesting referents for pronouns. A focusing framework is useful because it is much easier to confirm a co-specification using inferencing than to find a co-specification using only inferencing. Previous local focusing research (including Sidner's focusing research and centering research) did not explicitly and adequately address processing complex sentences, although complex sentences are prevalent in written English. We identify a methodology for determining how to extend a local focusing framework to process complex (i.e., multi-clausal) sentences. Furthermore, we argue that our methodology is superior to alternative methodologies. We show how we extended our local focusing framework, RAFT/RAPR, based on our findings using this methodology. We argue that our methodology is also useful for assessing and local comparing focusing frameworks and we show why other methodologies for comparing frameworks are inadequate. Our focusing research was partly motivated by a project to design an effective Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) system for second language learners. We explain how one should develop an error taxonomy and indicate how that taxonomy can affect the design of an entire CALL system. We explain how one can use a local focusing framework to correct errors involving inappropriate pronominalization and the inappropriate omission of noun phrases. While we discuss our CALL design methodology and justify our claims in terms of our project to build a CALL system for proficient signers of American Sign Language (ASL), our findings are applicable to the design of CALL systems for other second language learners.